Outraged at Ignorant People Who Are Blind to See the Destruction

The truth of the matter is that human beings do not know what whales think or how they feel. They have a complex language that has not been deciphered. They communicate over huge distances. They have large, specialized brains. They sense and know much more than many assume. They have long lifespans as well. It is arrogant to assume that they are nothing more than just so much food.

At least the indigenous peoples used to have some sense of life sacrificing itself for life, not that, that is the end-all-be-all of how to view killing whales.

Frankly, the nonchalant attitude about killing carries over into humans making war on each other as well.

With some people, life is cheap and so are souls regardless of the species. I don’t want to overstate it, but It’s unenlightened and compassionless.

Some people are just plain ignorant and stupid. Whales are such beautiful animals and its ashame the way they are slaughtered. STUPID< STUPID!!!and makes no sense… I do not blame you for getting angry…

Lily. it is a shame tha way any animal gets slaughtered. Not just whales. tha difference is that whales have to be slaughtered in order to kill them. Cows and Lambs dont. but we farm them for ourselves. it is not much different. I could understand getting that upset about it, if they caught whales or dolphins and slowly poked them to death with hot pokers, laughing all tha while. Out of those 25000 members Kimberly is talking about, we have just reached 400 posts. and probably 80 of those are me. of tha 300-320 other comments, most of them bash humans, and how Barbaric we are. And how we should be slaughtered tha same way. I argue my points, ppl get rude with me and can not display intellegent conversation or present a decent arguement. so I make stupid sarcastic comments opposite to those that can not bother to show signs of logical thinking.

Kimberly, my first comment to you, was not one of those rude ignorant comments in my opinion. maybe we have a different definition of anger. You did not appear to be one of those people so I did not talk ill about you, and I did not bring it in tha public forum where it was obvious you had not read back, I just wanted to personally fill you in on some of tha arguements against your points about being endangered. Im not sorry that you took that tha wrong way. I am sorry for the other things I said after. those were out of anger, because it seemed instead of challenging my theories about tha endangered whales not being hunted, (which you have since done), you first seemed to instead lash out in anger at me publically, exagerating, and not giving me a chance to defend myself. those rude sarcastic comments I make, are for tha ppl who dont bother to read back, even a little bit, and see what this persons opinions are. if you take them seriously and that makes you hate me. then that is fine. but for you to say that I joined that group to hate on you, and inject that I have nothing better to do then write you a one paragraph comment, (while wasting your time to make an entire blog about it venting about me.) I did not follow you around. you posted links. so should I have just let everyone but me follow them just to let you make points about things such as sarcastic comments leaving out what it was intended for? and lie (or unkowingly make accusations to back your play)? I dont mind being judged, but at least let me have my say. You are completely right Kimberly, you are not tha first person I have msgd. but you are tha first person that took it tha wrong way, and became what seemed to be completely hipocritical. you seemed more “furious” or “angry” then me. I dont normally send msgs unless tha person looks like they could hold a convo.. If I was angry or trying to insult you, I would have done it on tha wall where I normally do. Every other msg I’ve ever sent has normally bin replied to and answered with civil conversation. sometimes arguementative, but never angry. I want to hear what other ppl have to say so I can decide my own truths. I dont block it out because I love animals. My mind could be changed if I felt that someones arguement was real enough. I try to think as logically as I can, and I dont see whalers accidentally killing too many endangered species by accident. I am sure with technology today whalers are able to make a distinction between whats legal and illegal. after all it is their proffesion and I dont think it should be judge by someone because they watched a few greenpeace videos. with editing you can make something look however you want. in regards to that I appreciate that you let my comment through Kimberly. Once I noticed it had to be moderated I honestly thought you would reject it, because it seemed that you wanted to edit this story to make yourself look right. Im glad you at least will leave other people to make up their own minds.
you dont have to worry about me “following” you around. you will never personally hear from me again. you will however keep seeing my posts in that group if you stay there. dont take too many of them seriously, but I doubt you would have anyways. good luck with the direction you are moving. I sincerely hope you end up as an animal caretaker or something along those lines, because you do seem right for the job. you seem very passionate about animals which I think is a good quality to have.

Peace to all those that have to deal with tha killing and slaughter of animals, to provide for tha rest of us. it is a tremendous thing you are doing. may tha policing maintain and improve, and may tha methods become as less violent as possible. also Peace to all tha animal lovers that maintain sanctuaries for animals, away from predators. where we can help each other grow to evolve and understand one another. it is a tremendous thing you are doing. its what makes us different then them. You deserve praise, tha human race is not barbaric.